logo
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Contact us
logo
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Contact us

What Are the Best Ethical Investment Funds?

Ethical investing is growing as more people want to take control of their impact in the world.

Investing ethically doesn’t mean you’ll have to compromise on earning a healthy return.

In fact, investment firm Morgan Stanley reported that sustainable funds achieved a median performance of 4.7% more than traditional funds over a 5-year period in 2024.

We’ve rounded up our pick of the best ethical funds and share how to get started making a difference with your money.

check Fact Checked
  • By Brean Horne
  • Published: June 27, 2025
  • Edited by: Antonia Medlicott
  • Disclosure
  • Last Update: 1 day ago

5/5

Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity – Excellent fund performance. Competitive fees and high ESG rating.

point

73.1% 5-year performance

point

0.79% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

5/5

Royal London Global Sustainable Equity – Competitive fees. Very good ESG rating and fund performance.

point

65.5% 5-year performance

point

0.72% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

5/5

Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity – Strong fund performance.

point

65% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

4.5/5

Quilter Investors Ethical Equity – Exceptional fund performance. Comprehensive ethical investing framework.

point

84.6% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OFC

4/5

Liontrust Sustainable Future Global Growth Fund – Positive 5-year performance. Top ESG rating.

point

34% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.


5/5

Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity

– Excellent fund performance. Competitive fees and high ESG rating.

point

73.1% 5-year performance

point

0.79% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

check

Reasons to use

  • Reasons to use
  • Very good 5-year fund performance
  • Competitive OCF fees
  • Comprehensive ethical investment policy
  • High ESG rating
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Cheaper fees elsewhere

Brean says

The Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity fund offers a competitive blend of high performance with a notable positive impact on the world.

It’s a high-performing ethical investment that has returned an impressive 73.1%* over the past 5 years. As well as being a substantial return in its own right, this fund significantly outpaced the benchmark, which returned 53.3% over the same period.

Currently, the Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity fund invests at least 80% of its assets in companies worldwide that adhere to its values and sustainability framework.

The fund managers use a robust screening process and only permit companies that make a positive contribution to:

  • The planet: companies dedicated to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which helps slow down climate change.
  • People: companies making contributions to employee wellbeing, customer wellbeing as well as fostering healthy, inclusive and connected communities
  • Effective and accountable institutions: companies promoting financial stability, which supports people’s prosperity and financial security.

These strong ethical standards, combined with the high returns the fund generates, earned it an exceptional ISS ESG rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

This fund offers good value for money overall, charging a competitive OCF fee of 0.79% – which covers managing the fund.

*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25

5out of 5

point 73.1% 5-year performance
point 0.79% OCF

5/5

Royal London Global Sustainable Equity

– Competitive fees. Very good ESG rating and fund performance.

point

65.5% 5-year performance

point

0.72% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

check

Reasons to use

  • Good 5-year fund performance
  • Very good ESG rating
  • Competitive OCF fee
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Cheaper fees elsewhere
  • Stronger fund performance elsewhere

Brean says

The Royal London Global Sustainable Equity fund posted a strong 5-year performance. It generated a healthy return of 65.5%* over that period – outpacing the benchmark, which achieved a return of 53.3%.

Royal London demonstrates a commitment to upholding strong ethical standards with this fund. Companies are rigorously screened according to the investment managers’ ethical and sustainable policy. Only those that are making a positive contribution towards a cleaner, healthier, safer and more inclusive society are included.

This fund also expressly excludes companies that are involved in the following:

  • Adult entertainment
  • Alcohol
  • Animal welfare
  • Armaments
  • Fossil fuels
  • Gambling
  • High environmental impact
  • Human rights breaches
  • Nuclear power
  • Nuclear weapons
  • Tobacco

With such a strong commitment to upholding ethical standards and its strong investment performance, this fund earned an ISS ESG rating of 4 stars out of 5.

This fund offers the lowest OCF fee of all of our top picks at 0.72% making this fund an attractive option, especially when coupled with its substantial return history.

*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25

5/5

Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity

– Strong fund performance.

point

65% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

check

Reasons to use

  • Good 5-year fund performance
  • Very good ESG rating
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Cheaper fees elsewhere
  • Stronger fund performance elsewhere

Brean says

The Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity fund posted a strong 5-year performance. It generated a substantial return of 65%* during that time, surpassing the benchmark of 53.3%.

As well as offering competitive returns, this fund executes a robust ethical policy to ensure the companies it includes contribute to positive environmental or social change.

The fund invests at least 70% of its assets in companies that contribute to positive environmental or social change. It limits the negative impact of companies by avoiding those directly associated with:

  • Adult entertainment
  • Alcohol
  • Animal testing (both cosmetic and pharmaceutical)
  • Weapons (both controversial and conventional)
  • Fossil fuels
  • Fur
  • Intensive farming
  • Gambling
  • Tobacco
  • Nuclear Power
  • Human stem cell research
  • Polluting chemicals

This fund’s dedication to upholding strong ethical values while delivering robust performance earned it an ISS ESG rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

While the Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity fund demonstrates attractive returns, it falls short slightly when it comes to overall value for money. It charges an OCF fee of 0.85% which is higher than some of our other top picks.

*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25

4.5/5

Quilter Investors Ethical Equity

– Exceptional fund performance. Comprehensive ethical investing framework.

point

84.6% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OFC

check

Reasons to use

  • Strong 5-year fund performance
  • Comprehensive ethical investing framework
  • Exceptional ESG rating
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Cheaper fees elsewhere
  • Stronger fund performance elsewhere

Brean says

The Quilter Investors Ethical Equity fund generated an exceptional 5-year return of 84.6%* – far outpacing the benchmark, which earned 53.1%.

It upholds a comprehensive framework to ensure that the companies it invests in demonstrate sound ethical practices.

The fund focuses on investing in companies that promote efficiency in energy, water, resources and food. It excludes companies that are involved in alcohol, tobacco, gambling, animal testing and armaments.

The combination of strong ethical standards and outstanding fund performance earned this fund an ISS ESG rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

While it posts an impressive performance, this fund falls short when it comes to overall value for money. It charges an OCF fee of 0.9% – the highest of our top picks. Which may affect how much of the return you retain in the long term.

*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25

4/5

Liontrust Sustainable Future Global Growth Fund

– Positive 5-year performance. Top ESG rating.

point

34% 5-year performance

point

0.85% OCF

With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.

check

Reasons to use

  • Positive 5-year fund performance
  • Exceptional ESG rating
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Cheaper fees elsewhere
  • Stronger fund performance elsewhere

Brean says

The Liontrust Sustainable Future Global Growth fund upholds a comprehensive ethical investment framework to help you make a positive impact with your money.

Currently, the fund invests at least 70% of its assets in companies that have a positive impact on people and the environment. It uses 22 sustainability trends to help identify the best companies to invest in, such as, improving energy efficiency, making transportation more efficient and improving innovation in healthcare.

It also excludes companies that are involved in controversial activities, including alcohol, animal testing, climate change, deforestation, gambling and weapons.

In terms of performance, this fund generated a healthy 5-year return of 34% – still catching up to the benchmark which sits at 53.3%.

The fund’s stellar ethical investing framework and positive performance earned it a top 5-star ISS ESG rating.

This fund comes with an OCF fee of 0.85%, which can be beaten by some of our other top-rated ethical funds.

*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25

*We don’t make any money from the platforms for recommending them on this list. These are my totally impartial views that I think represent the best value for money.

What Do Ethical Funds Typically Invest In?


Ethical funds can invest in a wide range of companies and industries that have a positive impact on the world. This includes but isn’t limited to:

  • Renewable energy: focusing on sustainable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, tidal or geothermal power.
  • Clean technology: developing technology to combat the climate crisis.
  • Sustainable agriculture: meeting food and textile needs without jeopardising access to future generations.
  • Resource efficiency: using the Earth’s limited resources in a sustainable way so that they last.
  • Health and wellbeing: promoting and improving the quality and longevity of people’s lives.
  • Social infrastructure: improving access and the quality of services, including schools, universities, hospitals and social housing.

Ethical Investments vs Non-Ethical Investments


There is a long-held myth that ethical investments perform worse than non-ethical investments. However, there is increasing evidence to support the notion that ethical investments regularly outperform the returns of non-ethical investments.

Ethical funds returned 19.87% over a 12-month period compared to a 17.89% return from non-ethical funds, according to Moneyfacts research published in 2021.

Similarly, investment firm Morgan Stanley reported that sustainable funds achieved a median performance of 4.7% more than traditional funds over a 5-year period in 2024.

We’ve crunched the numbers using the performance of our top ethical funds and non-ethical funds to see which garnered higher returns.

Pros and Cons of Investing Ethically


Ethical funds come with several benefits and drawbacks to consider, including:

check

Reasons to use

  • You can align your investments with your values
  • Potentially greater stability because ethical funds adhere to stricter practices
  • Your investments can help make a positive impact on the world
  • Potentially higher returns because companies are researched more rigorously
cross

Reasons to avoid

  • Smaller choice of funds to choose from
  • Potentially less diversity as funds will include investments from similar industries
  • Potentially higher management fees because they require more rigorous research

What makes a fund ethical?


Ethical funds aim to give people the opportunity to invest money in companies whose practices match their personal values and beliefs.

They work by excluding investments in companies or industries that may be considered negative or harmful to personal morals or values, for example, weapons manufacturers, tobacco companies or companies that use animal testing.

Companies included in an ethical fund are rigorously researched to ensure that they uphold the moral judgments of investors.

Is an ethical fund the same as a sustainable fund?

Although the names are used interchangeably, ethical funds and sustainable funds are slightly different. Ethical funds focus on aligning people with investments that align with their morals and personal values.

Sustainable funds have a slightly wider focus on investing in companies that demonstrate good practices and policies regarding their environmental impact, social responsibility and internal governance.

These are known as environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds.

Active vs passive ethical funds


Actively ethical funds are managed by a professional who selects investment assets on your behalf.

Generally speaking, active managers conduct rigorous research over a smaller number of companies they invest in. As a result of this, active funds tend to come with a higher management fee.

Passive ethical funds aim to replicate the results of a particular market or index. A passive ethical fund tracks the performance of a stock index and adjusts the companies within the fund to achieve those results.

Since this process is more hands-off, ethical funds usually come with lower management fees.

Are ethical funds tax-efficient?


The returns you earn from an ethical fund can be tax-efficient if you use a Stocks and Shares ISA or a Self-Invested Personal Pension. That’s because any investments held in Stocks and Shares ISA fall under your £20,000 annual ISA allowance. Similarly, you’ll get a £60,000 tax-free allowance each year to invest in a personal pension or SIPP.

 

Can I include ethical funds in ISAs and SIPPs?

Yes, it is possible to include ethical funds in an ISA or SIPP. Most account providers allow you to add ethical funds using an investment app.

What is greenwashing?


“Greenwashing” is when companies use misleading or false information or actions to give the public the illusion that they’re doing more for the environment than they actually are.

For example, if a company’s products feature the word “natural” or its branding gives the impression that the packaging has been recycled.

Here are some real-life examples:

  • McDonalds Paper Straws 2019

In 2019, McDonald’s introduced paper straws that were described as “eco-friendly.”

However, in reality, the straws were not easy to recycle and had to be put into general waste.

  • Innocent Drinks Ad Campaign 2022

In 2022, Innocent Drinks released an ad campaign claiming that drinking its smoothies is good for the environment.

However, Innocent is owned by Coca Cola – which in 2021 alone emitted 5.17 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, up 8% from 2020.

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) found that the advert was misleading because it gave customers the impression that the drinks had a positive impact on the environment.

The ASA stated that the advert would lead some customers to believe that “purchasing Innocent products was a choice which would have a positive environmental impact when that was not the case.”

  • HSBC Ad Campaign 2022

In 2022 HSBC launched an ad campaign claiming to provide $1 trillion to help clients reach net zero and also helping to plant 2 million trees in the UK.

However, the bank failed to mention their contributions to the climate crisis. Which at the time stood at around 65.3 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year for oil and gas alone.

As such the ASA ruled that HSBC had “omitted material information and were therefore misleading.”

compare-icon
Platform's selected