Ethical investing is growing as more people want to take control of their impact in the world.
Investing ethically doesn’t mean you’ll have to compromise on earning a healthy return.
In fact, investment firm Morgan Stanley reported that sustainable funds achieved a median performance of 4.7% more than traditional funds over a 5-year period in 2024.
We’ve rounded up our pick of the best ethical funds and share how to get started making a difference with your money.
5/5
Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity – Excellent fund performance. Competitive fees and high ESG rating.
73.1% 5-year performance
0.79% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
5/5
Royal London Global Sustainable Equity – Competitive fees. Very good ESG rating and fund performance.
65.5% 5-year performance
0.72% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
5/5
Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity – Strong fund performance.
65% 5-year performance
0.85% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
4.5/5
Quilter Investors Ethical Equity – Exceptional fund performance. Comprehensive ethical investing framework.
84.6% 5-year performance
0.85% OFC
4/5
Liontrust Sustainable Future Global Growth Fund – Positive 5-year performance. Top ESG rating.
34% 5-year performance
0.85% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
5/5
– Excellent fund performance. Competitive fees and high ESG rating.
73.1% 5-year performance
0.79% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
The Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity fund offers a competitive blend of high performance with a notable positive impact on the world.
It’s a high-performing ethical investment that has returned an impressive 73.1%* over the past 5 years. As well as being a substantial return in its own right, this fund significantly outpaced the benchmark, which returned 53.3% over the same period.
Currently, the Schroder Global Sustainable Value Equity fund invests at least 80% of its assets in companies worldwide that adhere to its values and sustainability framework.
The fund managers use a robust screening process and only permit companies that make a positive contribution to:
These strong ethical standards, combined with the high returns the fund generates, earned it an exceptional ISS ESG rating of 5 out of 5 stars.
This fund offers good value for money overall, charging a competitive OCF fee of 0.79% – which covers managing the fund.
*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25
5/5
– Competitive fees. Very good ESG rating and fund performance.
65.5% 5-year performance
0.72% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
The Royal London Global Sustainable Equity fund posted a strong 5-year performance. It generated a healthy return of 65.5%* over that period – outpacing the benchmark, which achieved a return of 53.3%.
Royal London demonstrates a commitment to upholding strong ethical standards with this fund. Companies are rigorously screened according to the investment managers’ ethical and sustainable policy. Only those that are making a positive contribution towards a cleaner, healthier, safer and more inclusive society are included.
This fund also expressly excludes companies that are involved in the following:
With such a strong commitment to upholding ethical standards and its strong investment performance, this fund earned an ISS ESG rating of 4 stars out of 5.
This fund offers the lowest OCF fee of all of our top picks at 0.72% making this fund an attractive option, especially when coupled with its substantial return history.
*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25
5/5
– Strong fund performance.
65% 5-year performance
0.85% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
The Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity fund posted a strong 5-year performance. It generated a substantial return of 65%* during that time, surpassing the benchmark of 53.3%.
As well as offering competitive returns, this fund executes a robust ethical policy to ensure the companies it includes contribute to positive environmental or social change.
The fund invests at least 70% of its assets in companies that contribute to positive environmental or social change. It limits the negative impact of companies by avoiding those directly associated with:
This fund’s dedication to upholding strong ethical values while delivering robust performance earned it an ISS ESG rating of 4 out of 5 stars.
While the Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity fund demonstrates attractive returns, it falls short slightly when it comes to overall value for money. It charges an OCF fee of 0.85% which is higher than some of our other top picks.
*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25
4.5/5
– Exceptional fund performance. Comprehensive ethical investing framework.
84.6% 5-year performance
0.85% OFC
The Quilter Investors Ethical Equity fund generated an exceptional 5-year return of 84.6%* – far outpacing the benchmark, which earned 53.1%.
It upholds a comprehensive framework to ensure that the companies it invests in demonstrate sound ethical practices.
The fund focuses on investing in companies that promote efficiency in energy, water, resources and food. It excludes companies that are involved in alcohol, tobacco, gambling, animal testing and armaments.
The combination of strong ethical standards and outstanding fund performance earned this fund an ISS ESG rating of 5 out of 5 stars.
While it posts an impressive performance, this fund falls short when it comes to overall value for money. It charges an OCF fee of 0.9% – the highest of our top picks. Which may affect how much of the return you retain in the long term.
*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25
4/5
– Positive 5-year performance. Top ESG rating.
34% 5-year performance
0.85% OCF
With investments, your capital is at risk. This could mean the value of your investments goes down as well as up. T&Cs apply.
The Liontrust Sustainable Future Global Growth fund upholds a comprehensive ethical investment framework to help you make a positive impact with your money.
Currently, the fund invests at least 70% of its assets in companies that have a positive impact on people and the environment. It uses 22 sustainability trends to help identify the best companies to invest in, such as, improving energy efficiency, making transportation more efficient and improving innovation in healthcare.
It also excludes companies that are involved in controversial activities, including alcohol, animal testing, climate change, deforestation, gambling and weapons.
In terms of performance, this fund generated a healthy 5-year return of 34% – still catching up to the benchmark which sits at 53.3%.
The fund’s stellar ethical investing framework and positive performance earned it a top 5-star ISS ESG rating.
This fund comes with an OCF fee of 0.85%, which can be beaten by some of our other top-rated ethical funds.
*correct at the time of writing 26/6/25
*We don’t make any money from the platforms for recommending them on this list. These are my totally impartial views that I think represent the best value for money.
Ethical funds can invest in a wide range of companies and industries that have a positive impact on the world. This includes but isn’t limited to:
There is a long-held myth that ethical investments perform worse than non-ethical investments. However, there is increasing evidence to support the notion that ethical investments regularly outperform the returns of non-ethical investments.
Ethical funds returned 19.87% over a 12-month period compared to a 17.89% return from non-ethical funds, according to Moneyfacts research published in 2021.
Similarly, investment firm Morgan Stanley reported that sustainable funds achieved a median performance of 4.7% more than traditional funds over a 5-year period in 2024.
We’ve crunched the numbers using the performance of our top ethical funds and non-ethical funds to see which garnered higher returns.
Ethical funds come with several benefits and drawbacks to consider, including:
Ethical funds aim to give people the opportunity to invest money in companies whose practices match their personal values and beliefs.
They work by excluding investments in companies or industries that may be considered negative or harmful to personal morals or values, for example, weapons manufacturers, tobacco companies or companies that use animal testing.
Companies included in an ethical fund are rigorously researched to ensure that they uphold the moral judgments of investors.
Is an ethical fund the same as a sustainable fund?
Although the names are used interchangeably, ethical funds and sustainable funds are slightly different. Ethical funds focus on aligning people with investments that align with their morals and personal values.
Sustainable funds have a slightly wider focus on investing in companies that demonstrate good practices and policies regarding their environmental impact, social responsibility and internal governance.
These are known as environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds.
Actively ethical funds are managed by a professional who selects investment assets on your behalf.
Generally speaking, active managers conduct rigorous research over a smaller number of companies they invest in. As a result of this, active funds tend to come with a higher management fee.
Passive ethical funds aim to replicate the results of a particular market or index. A passive ethical fund tracks the performance of a stock index and adjusts the companies within the fund to achieve those results.
Since this process is more hands-off, ethical funds usually come with lower management fees.
The returns you earn from an ethical fund can be tax-efficient if you use a Stocks and Shares ISA or a Self-Invested Personal Pension. That’s because any investments held in Stocks and Shares ISA fall under your £20,000 annual ISA allowance. Similarly, you’ll get a £60,000 tax-free allowance each year to invest in a personal pension or SIPP.
Can I include ethical funds in ISAs and SIPPs?
Yes, it is possible to include ethical funds in an ISA or SIPP. Most account providers allow you to add ethical funds using an investment app.
“Greenwashing” is when companies use misleading or false information or actions to give the public the illusion that they’re doing more for the environment than they actually are.
For example, if a company’s products feature the word “natural” or its branding gives the impression that the packaging has been recycled.
Here are some real-life examples:
In 2019, McDonald’s introduced paper straws that were described as “eco-friendly.”
However, in reality, the straws were not easy to recycle and had to be put into general waste.
In 2022, Innocent Drinks released an ad campaign claiming that drinking its smoothies is good for the environment.
However, Innocent is owned by Coca Cola – which in 2021 alone emitted 5.17 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, up 8% from 2020.
The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) found that the advert was misleading because it gave customers the impression that the drinks had a positive impact on the environment.
The ASA stated that the advert would lead some customers to believe that “purchasing Innocent products was a choice which would have a positive environmental impact when that was not the case.”
In 2022 HSBC launched an ad campaign claiming to provide $1 trillion to help clients reach net zero and also helping to plant 2 million trees in the UK.
However, the bank failed to mention their contributions to the climate crisis. Which at the time stood at around 65.3 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year for oil and gas alone.
As such the ASA ruled that HSBC had “omitted material information and were therefore misleading.”